• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 10 (2025)
Volume Volume 9 (2024)
Volume Volume 8 (2023)
Volume Volume 7 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 6 (2021)
Volume Volume 5 (2020)
Volume Volume 4 (2019)
Volume Volume 3 (2018)
Volume Volume 2 (2017)
Volume Volume 1 (2016)
Alaa, M., H. Abdel Razek, A., Tony, M., Bawish, B. (2022). The effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on Behavior and Welfare of Broiler Chickens Reared at Two Stocking Densities. Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences, 7(3), 41-49. doi: 10.21608/javs.2022.133166.1144
Mohamed Alaa; Abeer H. Abdel Razek; M. A. Tony; Basma M. Bawish. "The effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on Behavior and Welfare of Broiler Chickens Reared at Two Stocking Densities". Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences, 7, 3, 2022, 41-49. doi: 10.21608/javs.2022.133166.1144
Alaa, M., H. Abdel Razek, A., Tony, M., Bawish, B. (2022). 'The effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on Behavior and Welfare of Broiler Chickens Reared at Two Stocking Densities', Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences, 7(3), pp. 41-49. doi: 10.21608/javs.2022.133166.1144
Alaa, M., H. Abdel Razek, A., Tony, M., Bawish, B. The effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on Behavior and Welfare of Broiler Chickens Reared at Two Stocking Densities. Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences, 2022; 7(3): 41-49. doi: 10.21608/javs.2022.133166.1144

The effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on Behavior and Welfare of Broiler Chickens Reared at Two Stocking Densities

Article 6, Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2022, Page 41-49  XML PDF (610.88 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/javs.2022.133166.1144
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Alaa1; Abeer H. Abdel Razek1; M. A. Tony2; Basma M. Bawish email orcid 3
1Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, 12211, Egypt.
2Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, 12211, Egypt.
3Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Receive Date: 13 April 2022,  Revise Date: 29 May 2022,  Accept Date: 06 June 2022 
Abstract
The experiment was conducted to investigate the potential effects associated with dietary guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) supplementation and different stocking densities on behavioral patterns and welfare indicators of broiler chickens. In total, 364 Arbor-Acres one-day-old mixed-sex broiler chicks were randomly assigned to four treatments of 2 × 2 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design experiment (seven replicates each). The first treatment (T1): standard stocking density (SSD) reared under 10 birds/m2 without GAA supplements, treatment 2 (T2): SSD (10 birds /m2) with GAA supplements at the rate of 0.06% (600 g/ton feed), treatment 3 (T3): high stocking density (HSD) reared under 16 birds/m2 without GAA supplements, treatment 4 (T4): HSD (16 birds/m2) with 0.06 % GAA supplements. Scan sampling behavior observations were recorded through video recording cameras and welfare indices were measured using 3 levels scale score. Results of the current study showed a positive increase in foraging and comfort behavior in SSD, while an increase in standing and a decrease in sitting was observed in HSD. Furthermore, GAA resulted in raising foraging behavior in SSD, however, no effect was noted on standing, resting, and comfort behavior. Based on interaction analysis, a higher standing behavior was observed by GAA supplements in the HSD group. Regarding the footpad dermatitis (FPD) and hock burns score, HSD was reported to negatively affect leg health as it significantly increases FPD and hock burns score, however, neither GAA nor interaction between Stocking density x GAA had a significant effect on welfare indices. In conclusion, HSD had a negative impact on the behavior and welfare of broiler chickens as it showed adverse effects on leg health. However, the positive effects of GAA on some behavioral patterns were more pronounced in the SSD group than in the overcrowding conditions.
Keywords
Behavior; Broilers; Footpad dermatitis; Guanidinoacetic acid; Hock burn; Stocking density; Welfare
Main Subjects
Animal welfare and behavior
References
AMIRI, M., GHASEMI, H. A., HAJKHODADADI, I., and KHALTABADI FARAHANI, A. H., 2019. Efficacy of guanidinoacetic acid at different dietary crude protein levels on growth performance, stress indicators, antioxidant status, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens subjected to cyclic heat stress. In Animal Feed Science and Technology (Vol.254).    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114208

Aviagen. 2019.Arbor Acces Broiler Nutrition Specifications. Aviagen, 04, 1–8.

 

Bailie, C. L., Ijichi, C.,  and O’Connell, N. E., 2018. Effects of stocking density and string provision on welfare-related measures in commercial broiler chickens in windowed houses. In Poultry Science (Vol. 97) (5), 1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey026

Bessei, W. 2006. Welfare of broilers: a review. In World’s Poultry Science Journal (Vol. 62) (3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933906001085

Boney, J. W., Patterson, P. H., andSolis, F., 2020. The effect of dietary inclusions of guanidinoacetic acid on D1-42 broiler performance and processing yields. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 29(1), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2019.10.008

Buijs, S., Keeling, L. J., Vangestel, C., Baert, J., Vangeyte, J., andTuyttens, F. A. M., 2010. Resting or hiding? Why broiler chickens stay near walls and how density affects this. Applied Animal Behavior Science124(3–4), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.02.007

CHEGINI, S., KIANI, A., PARIZADIAN KAVAN, B., and ROKNI, H., 2019. Effects of propolis and stocking density on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and immune system of heat-stressed broilers. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 18(1), 868–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2018.1483750

DIXON LM ., 2020. Slow and steady wins the race: The behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed. Plos One, 15(4), e0231006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231006

Dixon LM, and Copper JC., 2010. How low can they go? The effects of height restriction on the behaviour of pet rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). ISAE UK/Eire Regional Meeting.

de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., and Estevéz, I., 2012. Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders,EFSA Supporting Publications, 9(6), p.295E. 116 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.EN-295

Erasmus, M. A., 2017. A review of the effects of stocking density on turkey behavior, welfare, and productivity. Poultry Science, 96(8), 2540–2545. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex075

 Fosoul, S.S.A.S., Azarfar, A., Gheisari, A. and Khosravinia, H., 2018. Energy utilisation of broiler chickens in response to guanidinoacetic acid supplementation in diets with various energy contents. British Journal of Nutrition, 120(2), pp.131-140.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517003701.

Goo, D., Kim, J. H., Choi, H. S., Park, G. H., Han, G. P., and Kil, D. Y., 2019. Effect of stocking density and sex on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 98(3), 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey491

Hall, A. L., 2001. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare, 10(1), 23–40.

Heidari, S., and Toghyani, M., 2018. Effect of stocking density and methionine levels on growth performance and immunity of broiler chicks. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 8(3), 483–489.

Ibrahim, R., Abdel-Azeem, N., Mostafa, A. S., and Emeash, H. H., 2017. Studies on some Welfare Aspects of Broilers Reared Under Different Stocking Densities. Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences, 2(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.21608/javs.2017.62137

Jobe, M. C., Ncobela, C. N., Kunene, N. W., and Opoku, A. R., 2019.             Effects of Cassia   abbreviata extract and stocking density on growth performance, oxidative stress and liver function of indigenous chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51(8), 2567–2574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01979-y

Lewis, N. J., and Hurnik, J. F., 1990. Locomotion of broiler chickens in floor pens. Poultry Science, 69(7), 1087–1093. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691087

Li, X. M., Zhang, M. H., Liu, S. M., Feng, J. H., Ma, D. D., Liu, Q. X., Zhou, Y., Wang, X. J., and Xing, S., 2019. Effects of stocking density on growth performance, growth regulatory factors, and endocrine hormones in broilers under appropriate environments. Poultry Science, 98(12), 6611–6617. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez505

Ma, H., Xu, B., Li, W., Wei, F., Kim, W. K., Chen, C., Sun, Q., Fu, C., Wang, G., and Li, S., 2020. Effects of alpha-lipoic acid on the behavior, serum indicators, and bone quality of broilers under stocking density stress. Poultry Science, 99(10), 4653–4661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.007

Martrenchar, A., Morisse, J. P., Huonnic, D., and Cotte, J. P., 1997. Influence of stocking density on some behavioural, physiological and productivity traits of broilers. Veterinary Research, 28(5), 473–480. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00902495

Michiels, J., Maertens, L., Buyse, J., Lemme, A., Rademacher, M., Dierick, N. A., and de Smet, S., 2012. Supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid to broiler diets: Effects on performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and energy metabolism. Poultry Science, 91(2), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01585

Mohiti-Asli, M., Ghanaatparast-Rashti, M., and Tavakoli-Alamooti, M., 2016. Effect of sodium bentonite litter supplement and stocking density on growth performance of broiler and litter quality in summer. Iran J. Anim. Sci, 47, 441–451.

Nasiroleslami, M., Torki, M., Saki, A. A., and Abdolmohammadi, A. R., 2018. Effects of dietary guanidinoacetic acid and betaine supplementation on performance, blood biochemical parameters and antioxidant status of broilers subjected to cold stress. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 1016–1022.https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1450751

Nielsen, B. L., Thodberg, K., Malmkvist, J., and Steenfeldt, S., 2011. Proportion of insoluble fibre in the diet affects behaviour and hunger in broiler breeders growing at similar rates. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience, 5(8), 1247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000218

Ostojic, S. M., 2015. Advanced physiological roles of guanidinoacetic acid. European Journal of Nutrition, 54(8), 1211–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1050-7

Portocarero, N., and Braun, U., 2021. The physiological role of guanidinoacetic acid and its relationship with arginine in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 100(7), 101203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101203

Rashidi, N., Ghorbani, M. R., Tatar, A., and Salari, S., 2019. Response of broiler chickens reared at high density to dietary supplementation with licorice extract and probiotic. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 103(1), 100–107.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13007

SIMSEK, U.G., DALKILIC, B., CIFTCI,M., and YUCE, A., 2009. The influences of different stocking densities on some welfare indicators, lipid peroxidation (MDA) and antioxidant enzyme activities (GSH, GSH-Px, CAT) in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances, 8: 1568–1572.

        https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093183887

Skrbic, Z., Pavlovski, Z., Lukic, M., Petricevic, V., Djukic-Stojcic, M., and Zikic, D., 2011. The effect of stocking density on individual broiler welfare parameters: 2. Different broiler stocking densities. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 27(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1101017SF

Son, J.-H. 2013. The effect of stocking density on the behaviour and welfare indexes of broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. A, 3(4A), 307.

Thomas, D. G., Ravindran, V., Thomas, D. V., Camden, B. J., Cottam, Y. H., Morel, P. C.  H., and Cook, C. J., 2004. Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 52(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2004.36408

Thomas, David G, Son, J.-H., Ravindran, V., and Thomas, D. V., 2011. The effect of stocking density on the behaviour of broiler chickens. Korean Journal of Poultry Science, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2011.38.1.001

Vraneš, M., Ostojić, S., Tot, A., Papović, S., and Gadžurić, S., 2017. Experimental and computational study of guanidinoacetic acid self-aggregation in aqueous solution. Food Chemistry, 237, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.088

Wang, L. S., Shi, B. M., Shan, A. S., and Zhang, Y. Y., 2012. Effects of guanidinoacetic acid on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidation in growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Vet Adv, 11(5), 631–636.

Xiong, X., Yang, Y., Jiang, X., Yu, C., Peng, H., Chen, J., Xia, B., Du, H., Li, Q., and Zhang, Z., 2020. Effects of stocking density on performance, egg quality, reproductive hormones, and antioxidant capacity in egg-laying ducks. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 48(1), 454–459.

       https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1824919

Yanai, T., Abo-Samaha, M. I., El-Kazaz, S. E., and Tohamy, H. G., 2018. Effect of stocking density on productive performance, behaviour, and histopathology of the lymphoid organs in broiler chickens. European Poultry Science, 82.1-15 https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20193148753

 

 

ZHANG, L., Yue, H.Y., Zhang, H.J., Xu, L., Wu, S.G., Yan, H.J., Gong, Y.S., and Qi, G.H., 2009. Transport stress in broilers: i. blood metabolism, glycolytic potential, and meat quality. Poultry science, 88(10), pp.2033-2041. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00128

Zhang, L., Li, J. L., Gao, T., Lin, M., Wang, X. F., Zhu, X. D., Gao, F., and Zhou, G. H., 2014. Effects of dietary supplementation with creatine monohydrate during the finishing period on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality and muscle glycolytic potential of broilers subjected to transport stress. Animal, 8(12), 1955–1962. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001906

 

Statistics
Article View: 617
PDF Download: 676
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.